Ministry for the Future ist eine transdisziplinäre Produktion über mögliche Zukünfte im Angesicht der Klimakrise – und darüber, wie wir sie verhandeln, bevor sie eintreten. Inspiriert vom gleichnamigen Roman von Kim Stanley Robinson entwickelte sich ein groß angelegtes Kooperationsprojekt zwischen dem Theater Neumarkt, dem Collegium Helveticum Zürich und der Hochschule für Gestaltung Karlsruhe.
Ausgangspunkt ist ein spekulatives Szenario im Jahr 2034: Die Erde hat Kipppunkte erreicht, Regierungen reagieren, eine neue Institution wird gegründet – das Ministerium für die Zukunft. Innerhalb dieser Fiktion operiert die Produktion als diskursives Format, das sich fortlaufend mit der zentralen Frage auseinandersetzt: Welche Handlungsspielräume bleiben uns?
Das Projekt kombiniert künstlerische, wissenschaftliche und gestalterische Perspektiven zu einem Format zwischen Preenactment und realer Wissenschaftskommunikation. Herzstück ist ein mobiles Bühnenbild, das drängende forschungsbasierte Diskurse in eine begehbare, funktionale Infrastruktur übersetzt. Die Szenografie wurde konsequent durch Re- und Upcycling-Prozesse entwickelt. Sie folgt einer Haltung, die den Anforderungen ökologischer Krisen standhalten will – indem sie aus dem Material jener Krisen selbst hervorgeht. In vier thematisch fokussierten Episoden an vier verschiedenen Orten in Zürich wird der Raum selbst zum Instrument: eine spekulative Versammlung, eine temporäre Institution, ein Möglichkeitslabor.
Die Inszenierung bringt reale Wissenschaftler:innen, Performer:innen und Bürger:innen im Modus eines fiktionalen Ministeriums in Austausch – und mit ihnen die Fragen: Wie lässt sich Zukunft verhandeln, wenn sie längst begonnen hat? Was bedeutet Teilhabe, wenn die Katastrophe strukturell geworden ist? Und wie kann Raum für solche Aushandlungen heute aussehen?
Ministry for the Future is a transdisciplinary production about possible futures in the face of the climate crisis—and about how we negotiate them before they arrive. Inspired by the novel of the same name by Kim Stanley Robinson, the project evolved into a large-scale collaboration between Theater Neumarkt, the Collegium Helveticum Zurich, and the Karlsruhe University of Arts and Design (HfG).
Its starting point is a speculative scenario set in the year 2034: the Earth has reached tipping points, governments are reacting, and a new institution is established—the Ministry for the Future. Within this fiction, the production functions as a discursive format that continuously engages with the central question: What room for action remains?
The project combines artistic, scientific, and design perspectives into a hybrid format somewhere between preenactment and real science communication. At its core is a mobile stage design that translates urgent, research-based discourses into an immersive, functional infrastructure. The scenography was developed entirely through re- and upcycling processes, guided by an attitude that seeks to meet the demands of ecological crises—by emerging from their very material. Across four thematically focused episodes in four different locations in Zurich, the space itself becomes an instrument: a speculative assembly, a temporary institution, a lab of possibilities.
The performance brings together real scientists, performers, and citizens within the framework of a fictional ministry—and with them, the questions: How can we negotiate the future when it has already begun? What does participation mean when catastrophe has become structural? And what kind of space is needed for such negotiations today?
Teilhabe und Verantwortung
Das Publikum ist eingeladen, Teil einer spekulativen Institution zu werden: des Ministeriums für die Zukunft. Durch offene Sitzordnungen, modulare Raumformate und diskursive Interventionen wird die klassische Zuschauer:innenrolle aufgelöst. Alle sind Akteur:innen in der kollektiven Auseinandersetzung. Ministry for the Future denkt Teilhabe als strukturelles Prinzip – auch in der Gestaltung der Orte selbst.
Vermerk: Holzschiff "Arche 2.0" in der Wasserkirche: nach Idee von Federico Emanuel Pfaffen / Szenographie Simeon Meier
Description of media (en)
Participation and Responsibility
The audience is invited to become part of a speculative institution: the Ministry for the Future. Through open seating arrangements, modular spatial formats, and discursive interventions, the classical role of the spectator is dissolved. Everyone becomes an actor in the collective engagement. Ministry for the Future treats participation as a structural principle—even in the shaping of the spaces themselves.
Ministry for the Future ist eine transdisziplinäre Produktion über mögliche Zukünfte im Angesicht der Klimakrise – und darüber, wie wir sie verhandeln, bevor sie eintreten. Inspiriert vom gleichnamigen Roman von Kim Stanley Robinson entwickelte sich ein groß angelegtes Kooperationsprojekt zwischen dem Theater Neumarkt, dem Collegium Helveticum Zürich und der Hochschule für Gestaltung Karlsruhe.
Ausgangspunkt ist ein spekulatives Szenario im Jahr 2034: Die Erde hat Kipppunkte erreicht, Regierungen reagieren, eine neue Institution wird gegründet – das Ministerium für die Zukunft. Innerhalb dieser Fiktion operiert die Produktion als diskursives Format, das sich fortlaufend mit der zentralen Frage auseinandersetzt: Welche Handlungsspielräume bleiben uns?
Das Projekt kombiniert künstlerische, wissenschaftliche und gestalterische Perspektiven zu einem Format zwischen Preenactment und realer Wissenschaftskommunikation. Herzstück ist ein mobiles Bühnenbild, das drängende forschungsbasierte Diskurse in eine begehbare, funktionale Infrastruktur übersetzt. Die Szenografie wurde konsequent durch Re- und Upcycling-Prozesse entwickelt. Sie folgt einer Haltung, die den Anforderungen ökologischer Krisen standhalten will – indem sie aus dem Material jener Krisen selbst hervorgeht. In vier thematisch fokussierten Episoden an vier verschiedenen Orten in Zürich wird der Raum selbst zum Instrument: eine spekulative Versammlung, eine temporäre Institution, ein Möglichkeitslabor.
Die Inszenierung bringt reale Wissenschaftler:innen, Performer:innen und Bürger:innen im Modus eines fiktionalen Ministeriums in Austausch – und mit ihnen die Fragen: Wie lässt sich Zukunft verhandeln, wenn sie längst begonnen hat? Was bedeutet Teilhabe, wenn die Katastrophe strukturell geworden ist? Und wie kann Raum für solche Aushandlungen heute aussehen?
Ministry for the Future is a transdisciplinary production about possible futures in the face of the climate crisis—and about how we negotiate them before they arrive. Inspired by the novel of the same name by Kim Stanley Robinson, the project evolved into a large-scale collaboration between Theater Neumarkt, the Collegium Helveticum Zurich, and the Karlsruhe University of Arts and Design (HfG).
Its starting point is a speculative scenario set in the year 2034: the Earth has reached tipping points, governments are reacting, and a new institution is established—the Ministry for the Future. Within this fiction, the production functions as a discursive format that continuously engages with the central question: What room for action remains?
The project combines artistic, scientific, and design perspectives into a hybrid format somewhere between preenactment and real science communication. At its core is a mobile stage design that translates urgent, research-based discourses into an immersive, functional infrastructure. The scenography was developed entirely through re- and upcycling processes, guided by an attitude that seeks to meet the demands of ecological crises—by emerging from their very material. Across four thematically focused episodes in four different locations in Zurich, the space itself becomes an instrument: a speculative assembly, a temporary institution, a lab of possibilities.
The performance brings together real scientists, performers, and citizens within the framework of a fictional ministry—and with them, the questions: How can we negotiate the future when it has already begun? What does participation mean when catastrophe has become structural? And what kind of space is needed for such negotiations today?
Teilhabe und Verantwortung
Das Publikum ist eingeladen, Teil einer spekulativen Institution zu werden: des Ministeriums für die Zukunft. Durch offene Sitzordnungen, modulare Raumformate und diskursive Interventionen wird die klassische Zuschauer:innenrolle aufgelöst. Alle sind Akteur:innen in der kollektiven Auseinandersetzung. Ministry for the Future denkt Teilhabe als strukturelles Prinzip – auch in der Gestaltung der Orte selbst.
Description of media (en)
Participation and Responsibility
The audience is invited to become part of a speculative institution: the Ministry for the Future. Through open seating arrangements, modular spatial formats, and discursive interventions, the classical role of the spectator is dissolved. Everyone becomes an actor in the collective engagement. Ministry for the Future treats participation as a structural principle—even in the shaping of the spaces themselves.
Das Werk stützt sich auf Theodor Rehbocks Buch von 1898, "Deutsch Südwestafrika. Seine wirtschaftliche Erschließung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Nutzbarmachung des Wassers", um die durch die Wissenschaft gerechtfertigte Ausbeutung zu untersuchen. Es verweist auch auf die Regulierung des Rheinflussbettes und die Standardisierung von Sprachen als weitere Folgen des "aufgeklärten Kolonialismus". Die Videoinstallation untersucht die Erzählungen wissenschaftlicher Erkundungen während der Kolonialzeit, eingebettet in einen futuristischen Kontext.
Description (en)
The work draws on Theodor Rehbock's 1898 book, "Deutsch Südwestafrika. Seine wirtschaftliche Erschließung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Nutzbarmachung des Wassers" ("German South West Africa: Its Economic Development with Special Consideration of the Utilization of Water") to examine the exploitation justified by science. It also references the regulation of the Rhine riverbed and the standardization of languages as further consequences of "enlightened colonialism." The video installation explores the narratives of scientific explorations during the colonial era, embedded in a futuristic context.
Rückseite der Installation; mehrere Elementen angeschlossen an die „Maschine“ der Selbstreferenz: HDMI-Analog Konvertern, Android Media Players, DC 5V Stromversorgungsgeräte
In seinem Text „Videowelt und fraktales Subjekt,“ beschreibt Baudrillard ein Subjekt der digitalen Ära, das danach trachtet, „sich selber in seinen Bruchstücken anzugleichen“ und anstatt nach seinem vollkommenen Idealbild, sehnt es sich nach der „Formel einer endlosen genetischen Reproduktion“ (Baudrillard 1989). Technologische Reduplikationen und Erscheinungsweisen des Körpers formen das Konzept des neuen Selbst. „Es geht heute nicht einmal mehr darum, einen Körper zu haben, sondern an seinen Körper angeschlossen (connected) zu sein.“
"Videowelt und fraktale Entspannung" ist als eine Mehrkanal-Installation, die sich auf das Konzept des fraktalen Körpers nach Baudrillard und der Interpassivität nach Pfaller stützt. Sieben Bildschirme zeigen die Verlängerung des menschlichen Körpers, während ein beauftragter Bot ein ungezwungenes Entspannungsprogramm durchführt. Basierend auf der progressiven Muskelentspannung nach Edmund Jacobson ermöglicht die Installation den Betrachter:innen, an der angeleiteten Choreografie teilzuhaben und so die Verbundenheit des Selbst mit der Technik zu erfahren. So ist sie ironisch als eine interpassive ‘Oase der Entspannung‘ konzipiert.
In his text "Video World and Fractal Subject," Baudrillard describes a subject of the digital era that strives to "align itself with its own fragments." Rather than aspiring to its perfect ideal image, it yearns for the "formula of an endless genetic reproduction" (Baudrillard 1989). Technological reduplications and manifestations of the body shape the concept of the new self. "Today, it is no longer even about having a body, but about being connected to one's body."
"Video World and Fractal Relaxation" is a multi-channel installation that draws on Baudrillard's concept of the fractal body and Pfaller's theory of interpassivity. Seven screens depict the extension of the human body while a programmed bot conducts a casual relaxation routine. Based on Edmund Jacobson's progressive muscle relaxation, the installation allows viewers to participate in the guided choreography, offering them an experience of the self's connection with technology. It is ironically designed as an interpassive "oasis of relaxation."
We live in times of high competition. Survival of the fittest is the omnipresent motto in most fields of human action, especially in the western world. This philosophy was only established about 200 years ago and manifested by Charles Darwin and especially the Social Darwinists at the end of the 19th century. They believed that according to a law of nature, only the physically strongest and most aggressive individuals and species would survive in the struggle for life. Many Social Darwinists justified therefore capitalism and racism with devastating consequences in the coming decades until nowadays.
Peter Kropotkin is attempting in his philosophical work Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution (1902) to dismantle their arguments and based on numerous observations of zoologists and anthropologists, he proves, that the fittest species are the most sociable ones and that sociability develops intelligence, which is the most powerful arm in the struggle for survival. This includes insects, animals and humans. Higher moral sentiments and compassion is also essential for survival in all societies.
The ritual burning of sage in nature should help to cleanse the negative energy of social darwinism in our world and make room for a more cooperative society, that will secure the well-being of all members, even the most weak ones and furthermore facilitate a more sustainable, safe and content society.
We live in times of high competition. Survival of the fittest is the omnipresent motto in most fields of human action, especially in the western world. This philosophy was only established about 200 years ago and manifested by Charles Darwin and especially the Social Darwinists at the end of the 19th century. They believed that according to a law of nature, only the physically strongest and most aggressive individuals and species would survive in the struggle for life. Many Social Darwinists justified therefore capitalism and racism with devastating consequences in the coming decades until nowadays.
Peter Kropotkin is attempting in his philosophical work Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution (1902) to dismantle their arguments and based on numerous observations of zoologists and anthropologists, he proves, that the fittest species are the most sociable ones and that sociability develops intelligence, which is the most powerful arm in the struggle for survival. This includes insects, animals and humans. Higher moral sentiments and compassion is also essential for survival in all societies.
The ritual burning of sage in nature should help to cleanse the negative energy of social darwinism in our world and make room for a more cooperative society, that will secure the well-being of all members, even the most weak ones and furthermore facilitate a more sustainable, safe and content society.
We live in times of high competition. Survival of the fittest is the omnipresent motto in most fields of human action, especially in the western world. This philosophy was only established about 200 years ago and manifested by Charles Darwin and especially the Social Darwinists at the end of the 19th century. They believed that according to a law of nature, only the physically strongest and most aggressive individuals and species would survive in the struggle for life. Many Social Darwinists justified therefore capitalism and racism with devastating consequences in the coming decades until nowadays.
Peter Kropotkin is attempting in his philosophical work Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution (1902) to dismantle their arguments and based on numerous observations of zoologists and anthropologists, he proves, that the fittest species are the most sociable ones and that sociability develops intelligence, which is the most powerful arm in the struggle for survival. This includes insects, animals and humans. Higher moral sentiments and compassion is also essential for survival in all societies.
The ritual burning of sage in nature should help to cleanse the negative energy of social darwinism in our world and make room for a more cooperative society, that will secure the well-being of all members, even the most weak ones and furthermore facilitate a more sustainable, safe and content society.
We live in times of high competition. Survival of the fittest is the omnipresent motto in most fields of human action, especially in the western world. This philosophy was only established about 200 years ago and manifested by Charles Darwin and especially the Social Darwinists at the end of the 19th century. They believed that according to a law of nature, only the physically strongest and most aggressive individuals and species would survive in the struggle for life. Many Social Darwinists justified therefore capitalism and racism with devastating consequences in the coming decades until nowadays.
Peter Kropotkin is attempting in his philosophical work Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution (1902) to dismantle their arguments and based on numerous observations of zoologists and anthropologists, he proves, that the fittest species are the most sociable ones and that sociability develops intelligence, which is the most powerful arm in the struggle for survival. This includes insects, animals and humans. Higher moral sentiments and compassion is also essential for survival in all societies.
The ritual burning of sage in nature should help to cleanse the negative energy of social darwinism in our world and make room for a more cooperative society, that will secure the well-being of all members, even the most weak ones and furthermore facilitate a more sustainable, safe and content society.
We live in times of high competition. Survival of the fittest is the omnipresent motto in most fields of human action, especially in the western world. This philosophy was only established about 200 years ago and manifested by Charles Darwin and especially the Social Darwinists at the end of the 19th century. They believed that according to a law of nature, only the physically strongest and most aggressive individuals and species would survive in the struggle for life. Many Social Darwinists justified therefore capitalism and racism with devastating consequences in the coming decades until nowadays.
Peter Kropotkin is attempting in his philosophical work Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution (1902) to dismantle their arguments and based on numerous observations of zoologists and anthropologists, he proves, that the fittest species are the most sociable ones and that sociability develops intelligence, which is the most powerful arm in the struggle for survival. This includes insects, animals and humans. Higher moral sentiments and compassion is also essential for survival in all societies.
The ritual burning of sage in nature should help to cleanse the negative energy of social darwinism in our world and make room for a more cooperative society, that will secure the well-being of all members, even the most weak ones and furthermore facilitate a more sustainable, safe and content society.
We live in times of high competition. Survival of the fittest is the omnipresent motto in most fields of human action, especially in the western world. This philosophy was only established about 200 years ago and manifested by Charles Darwin and especially the Social Darwinists at the end of the 19th century. They believed that according to a law of nature, only the physically strongest and most aggressive individuals and species would survive in the struggle for life. Many Social Darwinists justified therefore capitalism and racism with devastating consequences in the coming decades until nowadays.
Peter Kropotkin is attempting in his philosophical work Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution (1902) to dismantle their arguments and based on numerous observations of zoologists and anthropologists, he proves, that the fittest species are the most sociable ones and that sociability develops intelligence, which is the most powerful arm in the struggle for survival. This includes insects, animals and humans. Higher moral sentiments and compassion is also essential for survival in all societies.
The ritual burning of sage in nature should help to cleanse the negative energy of social darwinism in our world and make room for a more cooperative society, that will secure the well-being of all members, even the most weak ones and furthermore facilitate a more sustainable, safe and content society.